Find a Lawyer

I T.AS. NOS. 1532/KB AND 1533/KB OF 1996-97 versus I T.AS. NOS. 1532/KB AND 1533/KB OF 1996-97

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 13 (1) (b) Conan Shahadat (10 of 1984), the difference between T & N and Article 133 surplus stock was announced with the Income Tax Department and the bank was promised that the bank authorities Denying the right of cross-examination of the bank authority to the assistive effect recorded by the Assessing Officer by adding additional statements, such a case can be extended even if there is a quantitative difference if there is no quantitative difference. And there was only a difference in the price of the stock, that is, because there was no quantitative difference but the amount of stock announced with the sector There was also a difference in the Yamaat and the promise made to the bank, only then and unless there was a strong reason, there could be no increase in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. And all other income tax authorities that exercise legal authority and jurisdiction, thus, the law applies to these testimonies, 1984. The appellate tribunal, capable of processing the income tax assessment, in the circumstances, set aside this increase on the basis of the difference between the stock declared with the Income Tax Department under section 13 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. The Diagnostic Office the to return witnesses whose investigation was denied precisely and after providing the opportunity for investigation in this regard, the latest order was passed by which all witnesses Who were trying to value the evidence. how to become a advocate from Sanghi lawyer