RAFIQ AHMAD versus SAEED SHAH
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCP) Sections 265 (c), 537 and 439 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), after framing Section 302/324 charge-effect trials, the accused filed under Section 154, CRPC Copies of statements of prosecution witnesses During the investigation of the previous prosecution's witnesses, v. Investigation Officer, ordered the trial, set a new charge and re-called all the prosecution witnesses for this reasoning, which led to Section 164, c. Copies of witness statements are listed under RPC. After the allegations were supplied to the accused, no objection to the investigation of the prosecution's five witnesses, before the accused took copies of all documents, including statements under section 6464, long before the CRPC recording. The same was provided to the accused. The prosecution's evidence was neither prejudiced, nor did justice fail, nor could the prosecution be unlawful. Providing copies of statements to the allies under Section 646464 easily, after being charged under the CCPC, the accused may, in the circumstances, most likely be treated as an irregularity under section 373737, c. CPC Trial Court Holds Order for Re-Hearing of Case to Be Illegal and Failure of Justice
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Musakhel lawyer