FATIMA BAI SULEMAN versus PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD., DAWOOD CENTRE, KARACHI
Section & 77 & 222 Petroleum Products (Acquisition and Compensation) Rules, 1974, R 3 Applicants purchased the full payment shares of the respondents after the transfer of the acquisition of the company which was subordinated to the Federal Government. ? His name was rejected by the applicant on the basis that the petroleum product supply requirements were not met in the application for transfer (Acquisition and Compensation R Rules, 1974 Fixed Shares Valid Title No Controversy) Was) denied due to any title or interest in the questions regarding the transfer of shares, that the application for registration of the transfer of shares was made on or on the date reported by the Managing Director of the Medina Manager (Company). Were not listed before. The question, which was purchased through the stock exchange, was not filed against any of the applicants 'claims and no other claimant was present before the court except the applicants. Respond Respondents' objection that the applicants were time-barred. Was not acceptable, the technical objections raised by the respondents without any sound basis were not understandable and in order to provide full justice to the parties, it was necessary for the applicants to acquire the exclusive shares of the respondent / company. The transfer claim was accepted in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Shikarpur lawyer