Section 14 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Handwriting Act (VII of 1974), Section 44 requires the landlord's personal proof that the landlord and tenant area were operating in the same business where the building was located. The landlord sold his business six months ago and took over the shop. The landlord could conduct a business in the same shop if he wants the landlord not to mention any business in his request or in a statement, in the absence of a contract, the statement of the landlord on which the tenant It was agreed within one month that the vacant shop does not appear to support any evidence that the evidence reviewed on the record is not evidence of good faith in the landlords applying for the tenant's eviction. The need for personal use by the source, as well as the statement, was not sufficient to approve the application if he or she was denied any such evidence. Was rejected, proving that filing the petition was offensive
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
