Find a Lawyer

KISHORE KUMAR versus ABDUL SATTAR

Attacking the tenant's defense for non-compliance with the section 16 (2) and 21 rent orders was not opposed by the tenant's request for a validation of the landlord and voluntary approval of the rent was granted to the tenant. , However, failed to collect the monthly rent within the stipulated period the tenant's position that the rental order was approved behind it was unfair to record the tenant's lawyer saying that the request for rent submission was ineligible. When such a request was not only made at the relevant stage. At no point was the tenant offered to pay the rent in any of the legal ways for renting, but the tenant's request stated that the rent amount could be adjusted from the security deposit left by the landlord. Is. In the absence of any term for this purpose, the rental agreement did not include any provision under which the rent security amount could be adjusted to control the non-rent controller's order temporarily complying with the rental order Under this the tenant's defense was dismissed and he was directed to hand over the vacancy to the landlord and it was found that there was no interference in the appeal. advocates from Punch lawyer