Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAMIL versus S.H.O., P.S. AHMADPUR, DISTRICT SHEIKHUPURA

After completing the investigation into the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Sections 1969, 170 and 173 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 435 Challan Investigation Officer, the accused has to be submitted to the prosecution branch before the challan court. Submitted with a request from. The trial took place, but the prosecution branch did not present the challan before the court and instead the Assistant Advocate General directed the Investigation Officer to dismiss the accused because he said the prosecution's case was very suspicious. And the accused investigating officer has to submit a report to the merged discharge. The magistrate authorized to investigate, however, according to his investigation, no proper evidence or sufficient grounds or suspicion had been produced against the accused to justify the proceeding of the challan investigation officer, upon completion of the investigation. , The authorized person was obliged to submit the challan before the competent court without unnecessary delay. In the opinion of the Assistant Advocate General Assad, the cession case was highly suspicious and would not be barred from excluding the accused from the competent court, the Investigation Officer, even though the Inquiry Officer had presented the challan, even in the case of the Inquiry Officer. There was no law to prevent the report from being submitted. Earlier, under section 173, the CCPC reported on its motion or under the direction of the higher authorities, in the circumstances, there was no justification for not submitting the challan. best law firm from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer