GHULAM ABBAS versus THE STATE
The complainant testified before the magistrate on termination of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 337A (ii) / 337F (i) / 354A / 34 Criminal Code (V 1898), Sections 227 and 561A. Was dismissed that his shirt was completely ripped off by the accused, and after the complainant's nude in the FIR, he faced public opinion, but he was mentioned as being nude and the public. The fact of the matter before section 227 could not be disposed of at the discretion of the magistrate. , CR 354 to the PCC, 354A to the PC: The PCC will amend the charge to the PCC under the circumstances, as the FIR was not an encyclopedia to cover every detail of the incident. Was added and reported by the magistrate after amending the charge. The matter was rightfully referred to the Sessions Court as the case was being tried by the courts at the discretion of the court, it was neither blind nor coercive, nor any misuse of legal proceedings. Or misused to frustrate the end. Request for justice dismissed for lower court orders dismissed for misunderstanding
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Rawala Kot lawyer