Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI SALEEM CHISHTI versus STATE

Section 344 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 219 and 344 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), section 44 remand order passed a remand order whose clerk presiding the court's remand order under section 344 Was recorded in the officer's absence. The CC, of course, was unauthorized and unlawful, but before doing so he was taking extra precautions in his premises to obtain the accused's remand from the competent authority and even after such attempts failed. The Registrar contacted the High Court and the Traffic Magistrate over the telephone and on their instruction the accused (Clerk of Court) sent to the judicial custody had no malicious or malicious condition. The registration directs that the process of qualification and discipline was not guaranteed by law, except On the other hand, in the absence of any corruption or misconduct in this case, the provisions of sections 219 and 344 were not attracted to the PPC, which resulted in the High Court order being dismissed and the appeal accordingly accepted. Done. list of supreme court advocates from Noorpur nooranga lawyer