ABDUL KARIM versus STATE
Sections 14 && of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) and 943 Penn Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bonds were the bail of the accused involved in a case before the applicant (s). Failed to appear. Acknowledge the notice, the court had no choice but to direct the bail bonds to seize the entire amount, which required no interference with the injunction in the order, however, the parties agreed and After the accused appeared in the court and was involved in the proceedings, the guaranteed amount was reduced from Rs 50,000 to Rs 25,000.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Khuiratta lawyer