I.T.A. NO.658/LB OF 1996 versus I.T.A. NO.658/LB OF 1996
Investigation of the Certificate of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 13 (1) (AA) and 65 Unregistered Investment Documents was verified under the original Assessment Cell Assessment Scheme after the Assigning Officer purchased an expensive car in the name of Assessment. And registration information. The proceedings were initiated under Section 65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and consequently the First Appellate Authority retained the action taken by the Assessing Officer, despite the fact that the Assessment had filed the affidavit. Do your best to prove your version of the sale. Provision of buyer, transfer letter and other necessary documents before the Revenue Authority but not paid any attention, as long as the doctrine of fact is attached to the documents certified by the Government Officers, unless otherwise proved. Not to mention that no attempt was made by the department to verify the cash available to Assisi. The day the car was purchased and no attempt was made about the truth of the affidavit
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Kunjah lawyer