I.T.A. NO.274(IB) OF 1994-95 versus I.T.A. NO.274(IB) OF 1994-95
By amending Sections 66A and 148, the cancellation of the validity on the change of opinion of the Additional Commissioner Power Assistant Compensation Mere Opinion, Lunacy issued a notification under section 148 of the Income Tax Ordinance to the loan assessing officer. Was not done Loans with the Assessing Officer were accepted as genuine that payment was made through a cross pay order. The Assessing Officer inspected the assessment, implementing 10 GP GP rates; Additional Commissioner imposed order / assessment incorrectly and bias, issued notice under Section 66A, redesigning this assessment. The observations made by the Inspector Additional Commissioner were hypothetical and certainly included a change in opinion that the assessment of the Higher Authority assessment made by the Assigning Officer under Section 66A of the Ordinance Order passed through the investigation. Could not be changed. Additional work could not be sustained in missionary conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
