ALLAH DITTA versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ
The Allotment of Land in the Controversy of Government Land (Punjab) Act 1912 Section 10 (4) was leased for a period of 15 years. Such lease was entered into the record of the right to change. Was leased, but not leased. Nevertheless, he had occupied the land despite paying the rent for the first year, but later, underground, however, was allocated to other people who he considered to be allotted the lease. Had become a tenant under the terms. Prior to the occupation of this land, after paying the rent, it had become the responsibility of the collector to hand over the occupancy to the owner and to issue the custody until the default person had disclosed it. It should not be assumed that when there was nothing more to do with the Allies / Allottee and it was the State / Collector's turn to act and to take possession of the Allies which the State / Collector failed to do so, it should always be understood that The requirement of S. had been fulfilled by the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912, for a leaseholder on the tenure of 10 (4). I would be standing.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Deh Pathaan lawyer