Find a Lawyer

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD versus DOST MUHAMMAD

The Special Relief Act, 1877, was amended on the basis of Section 42 Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), Section 59 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXXII, R3 and Section 100 in favor of the respondents. The justification for such a change was challenged after the tenancy of the professional tenant plaintiff's unlawful widow's death in question over the rights of the occupant to prove the ancestral common ancestors of mutant success Was needed and underground occupation of such common ancestors. The plaintiffs were in the custody to prove both of the components, though the common ancestor was ancestor, but it was not proved that the common ancestor was in possession of the land. The plaintiffs had no right to inherit the land in question. The defendants claimed that the plaintiffs who had compromised the terms of Section 59, Punjab Tenancy Act, terms 1887 of six years, remained silent and, after that, protest the D case again, the defendants had no right, either factually or legally. In the early stages of the negotiations, the parties before the Board of Revenue, who had not applied their mind and The parties were forwarded to the Assistant Collector who is based on the matter. The agreement had approved the change, the Board of Revenue should have recorded the agreement from the parties and decided on the basis of the agreement that the plaintiff's case was rightly rejected by the lower courts and approved on the basis of the agreement. The change made was rightly maintained. list of advocates from Rawalpindi lawyer