Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 420/34 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Accountability Ordinance (XX of 1997), Sections 14 and 16 Approval of Reference The Chief Accountability Commissioner was not barred by the Government from ruling the High Court against the accused in deciding his case or considering his bail pleas as the said reference is still pending and by the Accountability Bench. Was not acknowledged. According to the instructions given by the government to accept the bid which was confirmed by the record, it did not show that the other accused, who was a minister, had ever approved the bid, but if Even so, his error cannot be questioned on such an adjudication decision accused Further investigation into the damage or accountability of the dispute against the accused was sought, in which case the investigation was completed. And the defendants had all the evidence against the bee n based on the documents that were in the possession of the prosecutor, Section 4 20, Evidence of prosecution under PPC was not likely to incriminate any crime; under Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, the offense is punishable by seven years. The prohibition clause of IRI section 497 (1) did not fall, the CCPC co-accused, the beneficiary of the contract, had already been granted arrest bail by the trial court, the accused was admitted on bail under the circumstances. Was law websites from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer