SAKHI ZAMAN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) Contempt of Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail FIR was charged with the presence of direct daylight in the FIR. There was no enmity between the parties, according to the narrated version of the complainant who was the only real witness to the incident, after which it was alleged that the commission of the crime was hid for an undetermined length of time. Gone, the delay in filing the FIR was unsafe. In the given circumstances, there were grounds for conviction for the commission of an arbitrary offense used by the Sessions Court to grant bail, and the bail granted to the accused was withdrawn. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Chashma lawyer
