Find a Lawyer

HABIBUR REHMAN versus THE STATE

Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 265 E & 265 F Oths Act (X of 1873), Section 5 the accused did not plead guilty to the allegations leveled against them, the court acquitted the prosecution's witnesses Called later. After admitting some of the motions for evidence and various reasons, a second regular charge was made in which the accused confessed to the crime, no doubt, after which she could alter the charge, but she had another. There was no legal option to bar charges. In response to the second charge, the accused based on the plea of the offense were illegal and the trial court against the prescribed procedure not only recorded the accused's statement on oath in contempt of section 5 of the Oath Act, 1873 and Section 340 (2), Cr. What was The PC but he also affirmed / affirmed it under Section 6464, CRPC, for which he was not authorized and the conviction of the accused was dropped in the circumstances and the case was pending. When the prosecution witnesses were examined, at that point they returned to the trial court to proceed with it strictly in accordance with the law. jobs for fresh advocates from Kashmir lawyer