Find a Lawyer

MITHAN versus JAMEELA

The final appeal was delayed on 31st 198 1986, which was to be presented to the district court in view of the jurisdictional jurisdiction, before the approval of the appropriate court appeal against the judgment and decree of the trial court in Sections 5 and 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Filed in High Court. On the wrong advice of a lawyer in 1956, the High Court reversed the memorandum of appeal before the appropriate forum on 27 11 1988; The petition was also dismissed, the filing period was terminated on the District Court on appeal 27 11 1988, there was no basis for the lawyer's wrong advice to delay filing the appeal before the appropriate court, wrong forum. Responding to the appeal in the (High Court), the defendant filed an affidavit dated 15th 1988, in the court that the High Court had no jurisdiction, or In this case, also, oh, VI, R 10, filed a petition for the withdrawal of the memorandum of app on 18 11 1988 under CPC. However, the appellants did not take any immediate action and it was only on 11th 1989 that the appellant filed the petitioners for the withdrawal of the memorandum's memorandum and in view of his counsel as well as his lawyer's negligence. , Appellant / Applicants were not entitled to speculation conditionally. In sections 5 and 14 of the Limitation Act 1908 best law firms from Killa Abdullah lawyer