MUSSARAT SULTANA versus MUHAMMAD SAEED
1908 Section 100 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Appeal to the Supreme Court Second Appeal The concurrence of judicial facts related to the jurisdiction was set aside by the High Court in the second appeal, which had its own finding on the question of fact. Given place of The trial court and the first appellate court on the assessment of dowry articles relied on the evidence of the plaintiff after examining the entire evidence on record and merely for reasons that related to the weight in the second appeal regarding the value of the articles in question. There was no jurisdiction to go into the question. Whether or not the evidence to be attached to the plaintiff's case should be served by a trial court, the finding recorded in this regard in the exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 100, CPC Was not open to challenge in the second appeal because some other point of view on the evidence presented could also be interfered with by Hugh in the simultaneous finding of fact h the court only when there was an incorrect finding of evidence and Finding was based on surveys and analogies. Or on the irrefutable proof. Or there is a defect or defect in the process that could potentially have introduced an error or defect in the judgment of competence was not guaranteed to interfere with concurrent decisions on the question of fact under which the court's decision to amend The High Court made interference wrong and baseless decisions and injunctions. The High Court was set aside by the Supreme Court while the trial court's order and order was restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Manga Mandi lawyer