Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMED versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Section 7 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 164 (4) Law Shahid (10 of 1984), Article 29 (E) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Lease notification on public land for thirty years 27 3 3 1973 [as amended by notification dated 30 198 1981] provided that it is entitled to transfer its rights under the terms of the lease after payment of the lease amount. After the entire lease was paid, the original lease sold its rights to the subsequent lease. The applicant was issued a self-notice in the Board of Revenue, issuing the self-notice to the applicant, the transfer was declared in favor of the one who declared the transfer void and illegal, who subsequently transferred the land through transfer. The sale was achieved through sales, thus making an impact, challenged the board. Without exercising his mind on the right to the original allotment, he had wrongly decided that the original leaseholder was not entitled to lease the Board of Revenue as per his order. In connection with the lease, it was stated that there was nothing on record in the case which stated that there was widespread publicity for the disposal of the underground land. The Board of Revenue apparently did not follow through on the facts of the case, nor did it use the file of the case properly. Or before the alternative record that it was not a complete and substantial part, disappearing under Article 129 (e), the law was a testimony that every official act was in accordance with the law and in fact a false statement by the board Was caused by Of revenue, it appears that the entire file was not placed before him when the petitioner asserted his rights in the leasehold rights. famous supreme court advocate from Islamabad lawyer