Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus IV-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI (SOUTH,)

Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Scheduled Muslim Family Law Ordinance (VIII of 1961), Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition was denied by the Family Court for restitution of marital rights Two contentious objections to the dismissal of his claim were that his claim of restitution of marital rights was immediately reinforced with the suit of the respondents for the restoration of the Dover and the restoration of the previous restitution. In the absence of a declaratory order was erroneously rejected. Because of this, the divorce was canceled within a period of time, with the respondents becoming spouses. Two such points have already been substantially dealt with by the lower courts, whereby it is found that the petitioner's restoration of marital rights was dismissed while the second case was stable in such case. Is. Separate proceedings were directed for the immediate recovery of Dover, so the order of the Treasury Court was appropriate for the Petitteo, the divorce was pronounced in writing on 21 1992, and the petition filed in the court on 2 199 1993 being dismissed. Was objected to by filing an application against the applicant (due to divorce by the applicant). It did not say that she had rejected the divorce, so it was not correct to say that she had declared the divorce void, therefore, the applicant was not entitled to relief in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. famous supreme court advocate from Kamalia lawyer