Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AHMAD YAR CHOHAN versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION


Civil Code 1908 Section 114 and AXLVII, R1 High Court reviewing the decision of the High Court went into the depth of the evidence and requests of the parties, which shows the contents of the decision of fact. No party may be allowed. The request for a review of the evidence only shows the applicant's complaint on the basis of the review that the law cited by the court did not apply to the facts and circumstances of the case with such disputes that the law was exhibited. Was wrong or wrong, or he went to court. If the facts of a particular case were resolved in the application of the law inaccurate, or inaccurate, there would be no reasonable basis for review, as a result of re-review or appreciation of the evidence. Was excluded due to removal from the material.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Dir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.