KHALID MEHMOOD versus BANKING TRIBUNAL, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR
Article 199 Office of Delegate Ombudsman (Ombudsman) Order (1 of 1983), Arts 29 and 37 Banking Tribunals Ordinance (LVIII of 1984), Section 9 Constitution Petition Applicant issued notice to start a business by borrowing from the bank. The petitioner challenged the petitioner that the Ombudsman had allowed the ombudsman to reinstate the loan before the two forums started simultaneously in the case filed for restoration of the bank notes, but the banking tribunal yesterday raised the issue. Constitutional application for filing an application for debt collection The Tribunal's order stating that the Ombudsman The order was read with Article 37 of the establishment of the Federal Ombudsman Order, 1983 Office under Article 29 and jurisdiction of the court or other authority was banned and restrained in Article 29. had gone. The order is processed only if the accuracy of the order was specifically inquired into before any other court / tribunal suit of bank for obtaining a loan which specifically covers the legal cover of the loan. I used to come, therefore, to go to the banking tribunal, therefore, was not prohibited in any way.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from New Saeedabad lawyer