Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SOBIA BHATTI versus SECRETARY, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE

CHAP II, R 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application of the two academic years Gap was granted to applicants temporarily in the first year of the Higher Secondary School class due to the failure of an article in the Secondary School Examination Annual 1994. Admission was allowed, Subject Examination, failed subject in 1994 or first annual examination, 1995 Applicant cleared the failed essay in 1995, Higher Secondary School applied for permission to take the first annual examination in 1996 but academic reason Refused to give him the roll number that was for two academic years by passing the secondary school exam No dedication was given to the NE and Higher Secondary School exams, no penalty could be imposed with the intention of the 1996 Regular Regulation, but the candidate who appeared in the Matriculation Examination received instructions for two years while in the Matriculation Examination. The applicants were given instructions for two years. He was given temporary admission in his breath takes instruction in institution and intermediate education subjects for a period of two years (in the case of the applicant), thus, the annual, 1994 exam begins to pass and the date of the failed article Not by passing, if the Board intended it, it should deny the clearance to the Examination in parts and insist that the Matriculation Examination candidate should pass the examination at once and not in parts. If the petitioner fails one of the articles and clears it in the next year, his passing will be related to the exam. In which she actually appeared Petitioner was allowed to appear in the Intermediate Examination First Annual, 1996 immigration advocates phone number from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer