Find a Lawyer

ALLAH BAKHSH versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 53 and 172 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for claimants to take notice even before owning the property. The claim was made. Become the Owner in the State on the Variation of Sales Before the trial, the Appellate Court and the High Court defendants filed a pre-discrimination claim before the trial court that on the basis of certain changes, the defendants claim that the estate The owners were fake and based on the evidence on the record, the trial court was found to be fake, stating that the changes were neither fake nor fraudulent and were fully verified and based on that The defendants had also become the owners of the property and the plaintiffs were also the owners of the property. The State did not decide his case and the trial court's order was affirmed by the first appellate court and the second appellate court's plaintiffs also reviewed the changes intended to produce fresh evidence of prejudice suit error. The application for approval was moved to show that the defendants were not the owners of the property. Such a trial was to affect the results of the plaintiff's first vacancy and the plaintiff wanted to succeed. The plaintiffs had already filed a civil lawsuit for the judgment before the Revenue Court came up, with the Revenue Court orders proving that the discrimination claims were not owned by the property. The civil court's decision was bound by the Revenue Courts Order of the Board of Revenue and even approved by the Civil Courts Play immigration advocates contact from Tando Jam lawyer