Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHANEWAL

Application for modification of respondent's written statement for the specific performance of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Government Land (Punjab) Act (V of 1912), Section 19 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VI, R 17 When the case was at the last stage of the argument that it could be included in the claim that under the trial of section 19, Government Land (Punjab) Act, 1912, the appellate court dismissed such appeal. The agreement was banned in view of the provisions of the Court. It was also found that amendment to the written statement was not necessary, for the implementation of the agreement was not banned under the terms of section 19, Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act 1912, which was SCMR 1510 of 1992. I am clear from the Supreme Court ruling. It was against imposing sanctions under section 19 of the Act and not against a contract that could be enforced by a specific performance after the contract. Thus, the courts below concluded that the shopkeepers had the right to vote. Even if modification is allowed, it would be an exercise of futility because in this case a lawsuit based on the specific performance of the contract was applicable. Conditions online advocate from Head Marala lawyer