Find a Lawyer

MIR ZAMAN ABBASI versus AJK GOVERNMENT

Articles 44 and 46 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act 1974 and the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Courts and Laws Act 1949, Section 35 Civil Code (v. 1908), termination of section 115 evidence, jurisdiction, stopped the use of applicants' evidence. Gone because they failed to produce evidence until they were given numerous opportunities to present evidence but could not expect a review petition filed by the applicant against the order to close their evidence. And was enough to dismiss their revision even though they could be used by them. S. Under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974 and the court under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Courts and the Law Code Act 1949, but the fact is that the applicants had been sleeping on this matter for almost two years before returning to the High Court. , They will refrain from receiving any relief. The existence of any serious abortion was not shown in this case. Of justice so that the court may be inclined to ignore the time transferred to the Hugh Court immigration advocates from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer