MUHAMMAD MAHMOOD versus AURANGZEB
The questions involved in the constitutional jurisdiction of the controversial question of fact 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, can be easily resolved in the light of the documentary evidence presented by the parties, even where there is no other appropriate remedy. Was not available, that was, using constitutional jurisdiction to decide disputed questions, if the court deems it possible to do so in the light of affidavits or other evidence presented by the parties.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer
