Find a Lawyer

KARAM HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Crimes of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Standing in appreciation of evidence in reporting police presence became clear The father of the victim alleged that the accused had been falsely accused of adultery. ? There was no serious contradiction between the clinical evidence of some hostile ocular accounts and the confirmation of the ocular account, even in the absence of some positive confrontation between the medical evidence and the ocular evidence, the latter preferred against his opinion. Should go Regarding the duration of the injuries, the doctor proved that the adulteress had committed the crime through positive and clear evidence with the girl, resulting in the conviction of the accused but sentenced him to ten years in prison. With the benefit of reduced to 6 years \ 5 with the benefit of RI 382 8, the penalty was also set aside for the removal of CR PC strips. property advocate from Jehangira lawyer