MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus THE STATE
The crime of fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) did not face any delay in the evidence FIR was not delayed in the evidence The accused was the only person whose name was the accused and did not show record. Was if he was selected. After consultation and deliberations to name it, the presence of prosecution witnesses, including the complainant, was established on this occasion; medical evidence fully supported the prosecution's version, before any of the parties registered before the trial. There will be no hostility or illness. The defense was not established, which claimed to be the Hafiz Qur'an, committed a cruel and disgusting move by subjecting a poor girl to a six-year-old girl who was unable to make a statement. Did not deserve any kind of relaxation and punishment. The cases of the accused were retained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Shujabad lawyer
