MUHAMMAD ARIF versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION SADDAR, DEPALPUR, DISTRICT OKARA
Section 497 (1), third proviso panel code (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/34 cannot be held responsible for the conduct of the co-accused on bail due to legal delay which has remained on bail. Did not appear in court. In pursuance of the notices issued to them, the defense lawyer cannot be accused of delaying the trial court's delay on the basis of professional engagements - the suspect's detention before the indictment is almost exhausted. Was over Settled by the trial court and no delay has been attributed to it, as the record above does not say whether the accused was a former offender or a harsh, frustrated and dangerous criminal, nor He was accused of being involved in some kind of operation. The bail may be extended under Section 497 (1), PC under the third charge on terrorism charges and accordingly it was allowed bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
