LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus KHAN MUHAMMAD MAZHAR
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 54 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 117 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R67 Suit for Permanent Resolution, which is part of a scheme developed by the Development Authority (Defendant). ? The description was in relation to agricultural contact in the plaintiff, which the defendants also refused to include in the specific scheme The evidence of the official witness was not credible as they deliberately suppressed facts regarding the status of the underground land. In which the Authority Courts erred in the scheme developed. Depending on the statement of such witness, the statement of the Commissioner, who was assigned to the land boundary in the inquiry, is also the sole revenue officer under section 117, the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 and R67A, West. Was not guaranteed. The Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, can verify the land the Commissioner's report appointed for land demarcation is thus illegal. Depending on the state courts and the commissioner's report, the two court investigations were set aside below. The plaintiffs failed to prove their title in relation to the land covered, therefore, they were not entitled to occupy and own the acquired land, accordingly it was accepted that the defendants (Plaintiff) has no right or interest in the disputed plot and thus has no right to occupy and occupy it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
