Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR AHMAD versus STATE

The trial court was legally obliged to abolish proceedings of section 2302 / Cri 34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), sections 555A, 87 and 88, before proceeding to the trial of the other accused. Attend Detained despite the fact that the area magistrate proceeded before the trial session court without proceedings against the accused charged under section 87/88, 88, CRPC against the accused fugitive under section 87/88 The CCPC trial could not be started. Even to the extent of the other accused, who appeared before the trial court proceeding to hear the allegations by the trial court and to record the evidence of some of the prosecution witnesses, this resulted in the trial court being instructed by law. Accordingly de novo was canceled for trial. After getting the accused hostage immigration advocates email from Pishin lawyer