ABDUL AZIZ versus MALIKA
The High Court refused to interfere with the Family Court decision, dissolved by the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and schedule 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Marriage Family Court. The decision of the case was based on the wife's sole statement, while other evidence should have been made to prove her plea and that she should have sought the divorce in case of termination of marriage. To no avail, because the evidence will depend on the quality, and not the amount of evidence to consider the evidence contained by the wives. The courts below were convinced that the parties would not be able to live a happy and harmonious life and that the decision of the courts to decide the wife's case for the dissolution of the marriage shows that the evidence on record. The wife has plenty. His case was proved by the Family Court in his jurisdiction and justified in deciding the case. The trial court's grant of leave to appeal under its constitutional jurisdiction was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Nankana Sahib lawyer