MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE
Criminal Code (CR PC) Section 497 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail Police did not perform their duties from the beginning to investigate according to the law and to prosecute the case. All the effort for And with two live bullets with the destroyed bullets, although recovered, were not submitted to the police at the police station on the same day, the police did not take any action to arrest the named accused and deliberately fined the investigating officer. Was sent out and recovered weapons. A plea for the Franzic Science Laboratory, which was reportedly affirmative of the investigating officers by taking oaths from strangers, and the supporters of the accused party was not commendable, and senior officers also pointed to the same line. The police investigation was not valid under the law of the mediators and the party's oath was completed by the SSP's office in the mosque against the Qur'anic code of conduct which violated the FIR without an eyewitness. The damage was recorded very quickly, the incident occurred in broad daylight and a couple of sides Ray knew that the false identity was out of the question, according to the FIR, alleging that he had suffered an effective sole fatal injury to the victim, therefore, there is certainty that the suspect is involved in the case. The prohibited clause of section 497 (1). ), The CR PC suspect was denied bail accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Burewala lawyer