MANZOOR HUSSAIN JAFRI versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI
Detained under the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960 Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4, 9 and Section 3 of the 199 Constitutional Request, the West Pakistan Rehabilitation Public Order Ordinance, 1960, by the District Magistrate for a period of 90 days. The District Magistrate did not disclose, in the detention order, that he was authorized by the government or that he was assigned powers under section 3 of the Ordinance to pass an unidentified detention order; 6) was not approved in accordance with the West Pakistan Rehabilitation Public Order Ordinance's discriminatory detention order without any Ayrh authority and the ordinance was contrary to the provisions of Section 3 (1) (2), (6) and (6), I was reluctant to inform the applicant on the spot. He was at liberty to represent the government, so no material evidence of detention was denied to the applicant at the Government Ground and the right to a hearing, even the detention order, was the basis of deliberation and detention. Due to the reason, three detention orders against three different persons, including the applicant, were approved on the same day, excluding the name and address of the exception. Thus, all three orders point to the fact that they were approved mechanically on each individual case without the use of free speech, the detention doctrines approved against the applicant without legal authority and without legal effect. Was declared.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Astore lawyer