Find a Lawyer

UMAR DRAZ versus STATE

Observing the possession of abusive articles under Section 103 and 550 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Evidence Restoration Section 550, the CR PC had clearly stated in a writ petition filed by the High Court that the above mentioned articles were police. Did not seize the suspect in his presence, none of the prosecution's witnesses stated that the accused was in fact staying at the place from which Kalashnikov, etc., was allegedly arrested during physical remand with the police. Was revealed. And why the two respected persons from the recovery area were not made to participate in the search and to sign the recovery memo, which was a violation of the mandatory provisions of section 103, the PR accused has proved himself And he was evil in the circumstances for the benefit of the doubt divorce advocates from Muzaffargarh lawyer