MST. SHAH AZIZAN versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 201 Legislative Martyrdom (1079 1984), Article 3 The testimony of the children praising the evidence to confirm the silence of the record regarding the questioning witness to put some questions on the witness Qualification was not disabled. A witness, especially in the presence of a trial court note on the record, seems that the witness is intelligent and competent enough to testify whose child was 7/2 years old and 10 years old at the time of the incident. The only eyewitness to the incident was the witness at the time of the case, and being present in the living room of the incident, he was also a natural witness and he had clearly deposed that he saw the accused beating Wahola. ? The left specimen of his father, who started the skirmish and died on the spot, has the ocular testimony of the aforementioned witness who had no reason to falsely implicate the accused, other than to have confidence. The defendant was also encouraged by the recovery of the viola, which contained evidence of human blood, medical evidence and motions presented by an unwanted witness, and his defense version of the full denial was not convincing, and he was fully established in the prosecution case. Failure to make any mistake, the culprits of the accused were retained. Under the circumstances [witness]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer