MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE AHMAD KHAN versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Section 2 (1) (a) and 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Word / Ad hoc Appointment Section (1) of section 2 (1), introduced under the Civil Servants Act, in the scope of service rules. Was. In 1973, while the relevant government employees were promoted on 23 69 1969, the word ad hoc was incorporated into the service rules much earlier than the appointment was made through the appointment of a public servant, therefore, the ad hoc basis. Could not be done on There was a shortage of unauthorized orders under which public servants were promoted, the words used in the public servant promotion order were promoted to employ offic that and they would remain on probation for six months. At the end of the trial period, civil servants had to either continue. Going back to their posts or positions that were placed before development, depending on their satisfactory information, public servants would indicate continuity in specific positions even after a period of six months that they had received satisfactory information. Obtained de Probation was either extended or validated during the period of scrutiny, so the concerned persons, employees of the Government employees who were given selection grade to consider the seniority of the private employees in their cadre. , Would be the opposite. If public servants were denied such grades, then in the interest of justice, the authority was instructed to give such appellants the date on which the juniors were given such grade on the date of selection grade.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Sagri lawyer