Find a Lawyer

TRISTAR SHIPPING LINES LIMITED versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Contract Act 1872 Section 2 (h) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 4 and 25 Constitutional petition, Applicant, a Government Contractor, blacklisted from participating in freight tenders, blacklisting of contractor defamed against it. The staining will have serious consequences. In addition to suffering financial losses and losing business with the government, such a procedure cannot be done without observing the process of law, as Article 4 of the Constitution assumes that the ruling followed in silence for these reasons. Which was weighed down by the authorities in the blacklisting applicants. Article 25 of the Constitution did not show that a company whose big business could be ruined by the actions of a public officer was accepted and then responded to and applied for public works related to the rights and duties of individuals. Representations were also kept in mind. They were required to give precise reasons for those orders which were likely to take adverse action against such persons. It was the responsibility of the authorities to justify that position which was not accepted by the applicant. The principles of justice must be followed not only formally but also in a well-meaning and effective need for law. However, there was not a single way of providing individual hearing opportunities, which was considered by the victims to be written by the public authorities to deal with a particular aspect of the matter, it also required the principles of natural justice. Will not meet, order not to speak, there was no impedance order law jn natural justice family advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer