SAEED AHMAD versus STATE
Restricted (enforced) Order 1979 Arts 4 and 2 (l) Used as a public carrier at the relevant time, the vehicle shall be deemed to be included in the definition of public place as described in Article 2 (1). ? ) Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order, 1979 and the police, therefore, were able to search, seize and take action in connection with the warrant without obtaining a warrant; Although evidence was given that it was not possible for the accused to voluntarily impose millions of rupees worth of heroin (one kilogram) on the accused, the prosecution's witnesses did not charge any motive or enmity for the perpetrators. Did not prove or went to trial. The trial against the accused has been good, the technicalities, if any, were to be ignored. nces
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Washuk lawyer
