KHALID JAVED versus THE STATE
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Evidence Definition A litigation case against the accused was established by the prosecution's witnesses whose statements were consistent in material details and were allegedly based on the statements of the prosecution witnesses with superficial conviction. The contradiction was very minor in nature and was not. There was enough material to disperse the prosecution's case, but nothing was on record to prove that any of the prosecution's witnesses against the defendant had an aggravating motive that was alleged to have led to any The source could not prove his request for which he was falsely involved in the case. Even political statements and enmity of the prosecution witnesses, even in their affidavit, did not reveal any record which could explain why it was pressured and why the prosecution's witnesses were against it on illegal terms. The defense witness statement presented by the accused was fully established without any credibility case against the accused, the accused was retained, but keeping in view the quantity recovered was 500 grams. , The trial court convicted the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Lalshanra lawyer