SARDAR versus BAHADUR
Articles 17, 10 and 11 of the West Pakistan Cattle and Mortgage Lands Act 1964, Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). The effect of the civil court jurisdiction was not challenged before any forum and the court's decision was not challenged in front of any forum, despite the exclusion of the jurisdiction under section 17 of the Act, the civil courts examined this Will have the jurisdiction to do so whether the law complies with or complies with the provisions of the Legal Act. Exclusions or jurisdiction excluded from the exercise of any law, except where it is shown that an order passed through legal proceedings cannot be included in the scope of the relevant provisions, thereby interfering with the civil court and the jurisdiction of this law Outside the jurisdiction where such a civil court was found. In the suit of the plaintiff, who owns the property for sixty years, the mortgagor was no longer spared and he (the plaintiff) had become the owner of the land in this case not to fall under the purview of sections 10 and 11 of the Civil Court. As such, the jurisdiction to declare that the collector had no direct authority to occupy the underground by mortgage (Defendants)) The High Court correctly found that in the first round of litigation the civil court The order was properly approved by the civil court and once the deadline is reached, it cannot be challenged in any other case. The final question in the question will work only because the decision of the High Court decision, therefore, will allow the appeal leave to be excluded from these circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Bajaur lawyer