Find a Lawyer

DIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (SCHOOLS), PUNJAB versus NEELUM AMAR

Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 118 Para 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Terms of Service for Employees of Privately Administered Schools that the Government Demands for Equal Opportunity for Development or Selection Grade Was available to them. Although the government accepted the demand for employees of the same length of service, the service tribunal was not removed by implementing the same complaint of the employees, accepting the employees' appeals and ordering them to count the previous services. They have the right to take themselves seriously. Service Length Claim for financial benefits that was granted to the officer of the General Cadre after completion of some length of service. The government's main complaint against the Service Tribunal's decision was that employees were entitled to count their services for the purpose of obtaining benefits available to personnel. The general cadre has only been in effect since 1975, when the privatization of the schools was handled by the provincial government, nor from any earlier date did such controversy be canceled by Supreme Court employees who were assigned to the general cadre teachers. Went and the duties they performed prior to nationalization were of the same nature and responsibility as those of the general cadre. No reason was given for the services of employees prior to 1 7 1975. Why not ignore the general cadre's employees counting the length of their service for the purpose of giving them the benefits received against the service decision? Or gone. The tribunal was without merit and was dismissed property advocates from Jhal Magsi lawyer