AKHTAR JABEEN versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, CIRCLE-III, LAHORE
Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 10 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The plaintiff and the plaintiff's father were allotted the house in question, and so on. His compensation book was paid / adjusted to the plaintiff as a daughter from his first wife; after his father's death it was misunderstood that he was after his father's death. The landlord is the special owner and on the basis of such misrepresentation, his names are included instead of his name, therefore, depriving the claimant's third daughter of his second wife, separating the inheritance. Being forced to order the plaintiff to transfer the name to the knowledge of the claimants, who were the owner of the house said that they discussed the case for this declaration. On 27 6 1974 he had an exchange and did not have the authority to interfere in the matter after the removal of the Oval. Under plaintiff's lawsuit, the plaintiffs' lawsuit was already dismissed by the courts regarding the moderation convictions raised by the plaintiffs under litigation. On the basis of the evidence on record, they are entitled to equal shares in the matter as the plaintiffs and the defendants are the daughters of the accused under the question, they did not disclose before the Settlement Authority that the plaintiff was also his sister. Had obtained the exchange order through fraud and misrepresentation, had the jurisdiction, thereby, to withdraw its earlier order and to direct the plaintiff's name to be included in the transfer order, in which case the landlord in question. In this regard, thus, their
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
