Find a Lawyer

ANWAR SHAH versus MUHAMMAD ASIF

Article 4 Constitution of the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 (1973), Arts 199, 212 and 185 (3) for the appointment of subordinate officers from subordinate officers to fill seventy percent of the posts through selection on merit. Was needed. As a Stenographer and Senior Scale Stenographer, working on the Board of Revenue and in the subordinate offices that have had at least three years - experienced applicants whose length of service is longer than the defendant's Priority was allowed for respondent / constitutional application by the High Court on the basis that during the appointments of the abolitionists, the selection board should not have considered the total length of the services of the officers, rather that the petitioner's cadre was limited to seniority. Should have The defendant had no jurisdiction to entertain the constitutional petition in the case; it fell within the competence of the service tribunal, especially before the High Court, but was dismissed on that basis. That his fitness is involved in the development of a public servant and that such a dispute cannot be brought before the Service Tribunal. The petitioners claimed that this view taken by the High Court was not wrong for the determination of the principle of selection of the Tehsildar, for the purpose of appointing the post of Tehsildar, for promotion of the position of Tehsildar. However, the question of whether the officer as an assistant should be concerned only or the entire service of the officer should be decided in the light of the terms and conditions of the parties and within the competence of the service tribunal. law websites from Warburton lawyer