Find a Lawyer

FAYYAZ AHMAD versus HIDAYAT BEGUM

The Law Reform Ordinance 1972, Article 3 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Intra-Court of Appeal, was filed on the ground that the order was issued on 14 6 1993 Was filed on 16 6 1993 which was prepared by the copy agency on 11 7 1993 and handed over to the applicant on 13 7 1993. The intra-court appeal was admittedly tiled on 25 8 1993, thus the intra-court appeal was barred by the applicants for 26 days. On the basis of the delay it was demanded that the High Court be closed for the summer holidays, the petitioner's lawyer was of the view that the limit would not be reached during the holidays. Such an explanation was not accepted and the intra-court The appeal was dismissed because the delayed ban was delayed after the time limit was served by the specific bench of the High Court during the summer holidays and the petitioner's lawyer acknowledged that the applicant's intra-court case, such as summer. Appeals can also be filed during the holidays, but when the matter was urgent, The counsel for the petitioner also stated that he too had moved the petition for stay on the invalid order of the HC PLA taken by the applicant, so there was no substance and he was right. The High Court's Division Bench gave no weight to the delayed condolences, however, at the discretion of the Division Bench exercise, which resigned, which did not face such unlawful interference by the Supreme Court. Went, the appeal was denied under the circumstances us immigration advocates from Khandabad lawyer