NOOR HUSSAIN versus GUL ABBAS
Article 8 Constitution of Punjab Tenancy Act 1887 (1973), Article 185 (3) was dedicated to the mosque and applicant of the land covered by the land and its ancestors were shown as imams' land in question. The village was and consequently the entrances were different under which the applicants were shown to be the owner of the underground land, although it was actually dedicated to the mosques that were eventually found that were dedicated to the mosque. The petition cannot be owned by the applicants, whose ancestors were the imams of the mosque and did not have the provisions of Section 8, Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887. Applicants were attracted to the status of occupancy tenant so as to be supported by the record of the final result of the fact of the three courts below, nor to read any false statement or material evidence by the lower courts. Was pointed out, no deficiency was identified in the decisions of the courts below, but in order to guarantee intervention, the leave of appeal was denied in these circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Shadiwal lawyer