Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950 Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) imports of helicopters were subject to providing helicopter guarantee value on exports basis and payment of import duty on return basis. The payment of customs duty was completed by the applicant, which was estimated to cost more than thirty million rupees of the helicopter, under the orders of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was not extended to the crew, after which, the import Operators' airline license by which such helicopter was. Imported, the High Court dismissed the applicant's constitutional petition on the ground that the applicant had no locus standi. That the helicopter could not be registered, and furthermore, there was no licensed crew to fly, with no exception for civil aviation authority's refusal to allow helicopter operation / flight. The Court finds that the applicant does not have any Luxury Standards, which is contrary to the Supreme Court's view. The applicant had received financial interest in a helicopter paying customs duty of over Rs 3 lakh. That there is so much material in the record to show that the personnel refusing to allow the helicopter to fly is not justified by their being legally justified and performing political exploitation. Is. And that the registration of the helicopter was denied on the excuse that it was not subject to the relevant rules. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Rahwali lawyer