Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus GHULAM HUSSAIN

Article 12 Civil Code (V of 1908), suits for specific performance of the contract for the specific performance of the Section 96 agreement are the plaintiff and the plaintiff's real brother, however, there is no written agreement between them and the oral dependency between the plaintiff. Didn't work. The contract to sell the evidence on record was a clear and unambiguous sale transaction whereby the defendant agreed to sell half of his stake in Rice Mill to the plaintiff and sell it on behalf of the seller. Several sums of evidence were obtained on the face value of the plaintiff and in the material details it was confirmed by his other brother, who clearly stated that the plaintiff's share of Rice Mill's sale was leased. There was a religion, both of which were his real brothers, which the defendant had determined by defense that for the land in question in relation to the sale of this contract, the Rio The land was forfeited by New Record, the defendant was owned by two sons and he himself did not own any land in the area The evidence on the record clearly proves that the plaintiff defendant Ali was paid a certain amount for consideration of the sale, while the balance amount was payable, which led to the sale and acquisition of the specific portion of the defendant's share in Rice Mill. The amount was proved by the defendant and the plaintiff, thus, was entitled to the specific performance of the sale agreement best law firm from Kacha Khooh lawyer