Find a Lawyer

HAQ DAD KHAN versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MIANWALI

On the recommendation of the police, the constitutional petition of Article 3 (1973), Arts 4 and 1993 of the Constitution ordered the detainee district magistrate to be detained for a period of three months. Challenged the district magistrate's order in his constitutional application. Contesting this order was illegal and illegal and undermined in the eyes of the law. Similarly, the police's recommendation without a free mind was mechanically accepted after Dento further claimed that the order The grounds with the district magistrate in the sanction were not legally valid, holding that the constitutional petition was not enforceable because the DTNU submitted to the government under section 3 (6) of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960. Who had the authority to terminate or modify the order passed by the detained authorities There was an option to cry. He said that the supply is reasonable and effective, that the controversial and prohibited constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court objection was declared unenforceable because the detention order against Ditino was approved under illegal matters during the passage of this order. Legal and legal was not because the order passed against Ditino was non-judgmental and in the eyes of the law, there was no need for Ditto to file a representation before the government as the West Pakistan Maintenance of such representation. In the corner of the supply of section 3 of the Public Order Ordinance, 1960 Which Annie was not an appropriate or effective therapies that come from this. High Court Constitution Filed law firms from Matli lawyer